My first composition teacher, Karel Husa taught me to treat each composition as if it would be the only composition to survive me, and to do my best with each one. Once I compleated it, leave it alone. Cookie cutter approaches to composing are completely out of the question, not to be confused with honoring or creating a proper form such as a fugue, rondo, etc.
As I go through the dozens if not hundreds of electronic sounds sculptures that I've composed, I ask myself, "How would I feel if that were the only piece to survive me? Is that truly representative of what I can provide?" It's tricky because each piece is so different from one another. I wish to honor pieces that may be tonal, intense, silly, simple, deep, etc, without putting a value judgement on what emotional genre might be more desirable than others. So, I am developing my "gold standard" through unique and creative quality with a basis in emotional sincerity regardless of the genre to help determine which pieces I provide to the public. It is challenging to put so many creative pieces I am proud of having created into my "reject" file on my computer, if the piece isn't up to my gold standard. There are pieces with some magical 30 seconds or 1 minute or more that sometimes exceed an overall gist of a gold standard, but is in my reject folder because of the integrity of the piece as a whole isn't up to snuff. I try to act as a "buyer" for my site, selecting the mp3s for the works page that are truly original art pieces of the quality I hope people will come to expect from me!
I have full intentions of adding a new electronic sounds sculpture each week, and also, I have special drones that I'll have up to purchase that instrumentalists can use for intonation and improvisational work.
Musically Yours,
Kathryn